Eggz n' Rice

So yeah, we post stuff here ^_^

thunderupton:

can we please stop complimenting people by comparing them to ourselves?

“you’re so good looking and I’m just over here like a potato” no. stop.
a compliment is supposed to make someone feel good, not make two people feel bad or awkward.

stop self depreciating compliments 2k14

souljaboyemoji:

weloveshortvideos:

Vine by Patrick Barnes

*pup voice* WOOHOO

vinegod:

Ok I’m just gonna do this all the time by Joe Santagato

itoldyouimbusy:

Bitch I’m on my swag

mmkayn:

vastderp:

lalaland1212:

theatre-whovian:

vastderp:

Meet the Mona Lisa of the Prado, the earliest known copy of Da Vinci’s best portrait. Similarity in the undersketch of the painting indicates that this was very likely painted concurrently with the original Mona Lisa, by a student of Da Vinci.
There is much controversy in the art world over the question of whether or not to clean the fragile Mona Lisa, but her sister has been restored and some fairly odd later alterations removed to show the original vibrant colors and lighting. Some details, such as the sheerness of her shawl and the pattern on the neckline of her dress, have become utterly obscured in the original, but in the restored copy they’re perfectly clear.
It blows my mind a little bit to look at these two sisters side-by-side and imagine how much vivid detail could be hiding in the Mona Lisa under 500 years of rotten varnish. 

THE COPY HAS EYEBROWS

Your response to a beautiful piece of artwork done by Leonardo Da Vinci himself is “SHES GOT EYEBROWS”. Alright. All intelligent life has been lost.

Yo Snooty McSnotwhine, the Mona Lisa’s vanished eyebrows have been the subject of debate and analysis in the art expert community for hundreds of years, long before your parents squirted water at each other from across the clown car and then honked their bicycle horns to indicate they really wanted to make a smug, insufferable little clown baby together. 

this continues to be the best reply to a criticizing comment on this site

mmkayn:

vastderp:

lalaland1212:

theatre-whovian:

vastderp:

Meet the Mona Lisa of the Prado, the earliest known copy of Da Vinci’s best portrait. Similarity in the undersketch of the painting indicates that this was very likely painted concurrently with the original Mona Lisa, by a student of Da Vinci.

There is much controversy in the art world over the question of whether or not to clean the fragile Mona Lisa, but her sister has been restored and some fairly odd later alterations removed to show the original vibrant colors and lighting. Some details, such as the sheerness of her shawl and the pattern on the neckline of her dress, have become utterly obscured in the original, but in the restored copy they’re perfectly clear.

It blows my mind a little bit to look at these two sisters side-by-side and imagine how much vivid detail could be hiding in the Mona Lisa under 500 years of rotten varnish. 

THE COPY HAS EYEBROWS

Your response to a beautiful piece of artwork done by Leonardo Da Vinci himself is “SHES GOT EYEBROWS”. Alright. All intelligent life has been lost.

Yo Snooty McSnotwhine, the Mona Lisa’s vanished eyebrows have been the subject of debate and analysis in the art expert community for hundreds of years, long before your parents squirted water at each other from across the clown car and then honked their bicycle horns to indicate they really wanted to make a smug, insufferable little clown baby together. 

this continues to be the best reply to a criticizing comment on this site

The good folks at the Washington Post’s Vox have compiled a damning indictment of Cheney’s deep dishonesty about Iraq. In the interest of brevity, let me focus on a few lowlights:

He said the lead 9/11 hijacker “did go to Prague, and he did meet with a senior official of the Iraqi intelligence service … several months before the attack.” Wrong, according to a Senate Intelligence Committee report.

He said Saddam had “an established relationship with al Qaeda.” Wrong .

Cheney claimed there was “irrefutable evidence” Saddam had reconstituted his nuclear program. Wrong.

He said Saddam “had an established relationship with al Qaeda, providing training to al Qaeda members in areas of poisons, gases and conventional bombs.” Wrong.

He said there was “overwhelming” evidence of ties between al Qaeda and Iraq. Wrong.

He said that we’d be “greeted as liberators” and that the insurgency was in its “last throes” nine years ago. Wrong and wrong.

And that’s just on Iraq.

– Paul Begala, "Does Dick Cheney Believe His Lies" (video)